Skip to main content

Knowledge Organisers and Quizzing: Minimising the Matthew Effect


I believe that knowledge organisers can be the ultimate tool of inclusion. However, used poorly they can amplify the Matthew Effect, supporting most able while simultaneously disadvantaging those who need the most support. Put simply, they can cause the knowledge rich to get richer and the knowledge poor to get poorer. Over the four years which my department has used knowledge organisers, we have developed a number of techniques to minimise this effect and ensure that knowledge organisers benefit as many pupils as possible.

Quiz questions:
In order to encourage pupils to engage with the knowledge organisers, all of our homework is based around either answering quiz questions or practising quizzes which they have already completed.

Originally, pupils wrote their own questions and answers. They were required to write a minimum of 7 questions and answers which the teacher would collect feedback on while they were completing their starters. Pupils would then have a set amount of time to improve their work.

Problems with this approach:
  • It was difficult to meaningfully check 30 sets of questions and answers during the starter. Taking quiz books in would have massively increased teacher workload and would have delayed both feedback and further homework.
  • The variety of questions and the differences in quality, particularly in lower sets, meant that improving questions often took up a significant portion of lesson time, meaning that some classes were continually behind their peers.
  • Pupils who needed extra support with literacy often found reading the knowledge organisers and writing high quality questions extremely difficult during the time limit set for homework tasks. This often resulted in short quizzes, poor quality quizzes or avoiding the piece of work entirely.

Solution:
We now give all pupils a set of questions for each section of their knowledge organiser and pupils who wish to add extra questions to their quiz they are free to do so. Pupils answer the questions with the knowledge organiser next to them and we emphasise that the purpose of this type of homework is engaging with the knowledge organiser, rather than completing the questions from memory.
Having a consistent set of questions makes it much easier for teachers to identify and correct misconceptions while collecting feedback during the starter and ensures that all pupils meet a sufficiently high ‘floor standard’.

Presentation of information:
I originally saw knowledge organisers as an opportunity to teach pupils content beyond my wildest dreams. I packed as much information as possible onto the knowledge organiser and wrote the information in paragraphs in order to encourage them to practise reading.

Problems with this approach:
  • The lack of clearly explained key words meant that some pupils either gave up or developed large misconceptions when reading the information due to difficulties understanding the content.
  • The text was often far too small for pupils to read.
  • The amount of information which needed to be covered in pupils’ quizzes was huge. As a result, many quizzes were vague and many only covered a small portion of the information contained within the knowledge organiser. Some pupils found the amount of text overwhelming.
  • The lack of clear sections meant that pupils were often unsure what they were supposed to be writing questions about, meaning that some areas were missed.

Solution:
All knowledge organisers within the department are now written according to a standard format: there is a keywords box in the same place on every page, all notes are written using diagrams, bullet points or tables, all sections are numbered (which matches up to a quiz with the same title and number) and, wherever possible, we use dual coding. All of these strategies are designed to make it as easy as possible for pupils to read the information and to check any terms they don’t understand.

Accessibility:
When I first made knowledge organisers, I wrote them during term time as I planned the accompanying lessons. I would give pupils a paper copy of the knowledge organiser at the end of the lesson.

Problems with this approach:
  • Pupils who were absent did not get a copy of the knowledge organiser page. They were often unaware that the homework had been set and would not come to collect the sheet.
  • If pupils lost their sheet, they would be unable to complete the homework. While they could come and see me over the course of the week, most pupils who needed extra support did not do so.
  • The knowledge organiser pages were specific to my groups, meaning that pupils who were in other groups did not benefit from them and there was a certain amount of inconsistency between different teaching groups.

Solution:
All knowledge organisers are now written before the unit is taught by the person who is responsible for the medium term planning of that topic. Knowledge organisers are pre-printed as an overall set and every pupil is given a copy at the beginning of the unit. The knowledge organiser is also available on the school website.

This minimises the risk of absent pupils missing sheets and gives them opportunities to close gaps in their knowledge independently. If pupils lose their knowledge organisers or have to complete their homework in multiple possible locations, they are guaranteed access to the information so long as they have access to the internet.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knowledge Organisers: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly

The term "knowledge organiser" has been used a lot over the last few years. They are a tool of which I am a passionate advocate. However, opinions of them appear to be divided; While I have met many teachers who share my passion, others have been nonplussed or told me to 'just use a revision guide'. To me, knowledge organisers are the ultimate tool of inclusion. They will never replace the benefit of being taught by an expert. However, they create a situation in which every child, regardless of special need, attendance or socio-economic status, can have access to the core knowledge they need to succeed. However, this only happens if knowledge organisers are written well; I believe, in order to realise their benefits, knowledge organisers must be focused, sequential and accessible . Accessible: Many pupils will arrive at secondary school lacking in cultural capital, with a limited vocabulary or with little experience of subjects such as history or geog...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Battle of the Knowledge Organisers with metacognition.org.uk

The world of Knowledge Organisers is often a dichotomous one. Are you team ‘narrative’, or team ‘grid’? In this blog, Becky Sayers and Nathan Burns explore the purpose of both types, as well as their respective advantages, disadvantages and applicability across subjects. So place your bets, as the fight is about to start…!   Becky Sayers writes about the definition, purpose, advantages and disadvantages of the ‘narrative’   Knowledge Organiser. The ‘Narrative’ Knowledge Organiser Why do we use Knowledge Organisers? As a faculty, we have been using Knowledge Organisers for around seven or eight years. If I’m honest, the original reason I used them is because I was told to do so by a faculty leader in whom I had immense trust. I did not understand their overall purpose and, as a result, the pages I produced were fairly poor quality. However, over the years we have thought carefully as a team about their purpose and, as a result, the Knowledge Organisers we have produce...
Post a Comment
Read more

Building the foundation: How I write knowledge organisers

In my last post, “Knowledge Organisers: the good, the bad and ugly”, I argued that while knowledge organisers can be a powerful tool of inclusion, they only work if they are focused, sequential and accessible . When I first started writing knowledge organisers two years ago, my attempts did not even come close to meeting these criteria. As a result, they were cluttered, unfocused and ultimately an exercise in fashion over function. Since then, I have devised a standard method to ensure that any knowledge organisers I make have an impact and can be used in the long term: Identify key knowledge. Group your facts into sections. Write your sections. Number or code your sections. Quality assure your sections. 1.        Identify key knowledge It’s easy to fall into the trap of including too much in a knowledge organiser, particularly when writing about topics we’re interested or about which we know a lot. We want to share our passion and subject...
2 comments
Read more