Skip to main content

What makes a bad knowledge organiser? A self assessment of one of my early attempts.

I have written extensively about what knowledge organisers should be and how I write them. However, I also believe that, just as when teaching a class, it is important to look and dissect examples of strong and weak knowledge organisers.

In this post, I will be looking at what I see as an example of an ambitious but poorly written knowledge organiser. This document was written for a cohort of year 7s who were being introduced to Elizabeth I for the first time.



WWW:

  • This teacher clearly has high expectations of their pupils: as well as a number of pieces of complex vocabulary, this document briefly covers a number of complex concepts, such as the tension between Protestantism and Catholicism.
  • The use of quotations and dates demonstrates this teacher's emphasis on concrete examples.
  • The timeline at the bottom of the page attempts to fit Elizabeth I within the narrative of other Tudor monarchs. Assuming that pupils had already studied Edward VI and Mary I, this knowledge organiser should encourage them to make connections between the three monarchs.
  • Some of the keywords have been defined in accessible terms.
HTI:
  • This knowledge organiser contains very little in the way of concrete facts about Elizabeth's reign. While pupils should benefit from understanding the key terms generally (assuming they are used within lessons), the knowledge organiser does not actually explain why they are there or what connection they have with Elizabeth's reign. It appears that pupils would actually have to use the website in the "Useful websites" box to get the basic information needed to understand the relevance of much of this document.
  • While there are a lot of key terms, they seem to focus on what may be taught rather than understanding the content of the knowledge organiser itself. Difficult terms, such as "absolute power" remain undefined.
  • It is unclear whether pupils are expected to memorise entire quotations or, indeed, what the purpose of including quotations is.
  • The text of the timeline is far too small. Many pupils may simply opt out of using it.
  • This knowledge organiser seems to be pulling in a number of different directions. It is unclear whether it is focusing on a specific aspect of Elizabeth's reign, her relationship with other monarchs or whether it is supposed to act as an introduction.
Analysis:
This knowledge organiser is a classic example of unrestricted enthusasism: the teacher has a lot they want to communicate (arguably far too much for one A4 side) and in trying to condense that amount of information, they have lost a lot of the meaning. 

This overload also means that this document isn't fit for purpose. If knowledge organisers are primarily viewed as a tool of inclusion, this document will exclude weaker readers, those lacking the cultural capital to define the undefined key terms and those without access to the internet. Even if pupils were taught the content in lessons, the obtuse nature of the information provided would put pupils who were absent at even more of a disadvantage.

The lack of focus in this document also makes it difficult to discern the salient points which pupils need to know. This may due to a scheme of work which teaches periods chronologically, rather than by question or theme.

Final Verdict:
This is a good document to extend pupils further. However, it's obtuse nature and inaccessibility would make it unhelpful for the majority of year 7s who were being introduced to this topic for the first time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Knowledge Organisers: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly

The term "knowledge organiser" has been used a lot over the last few years. They are a tool of which I am a passionate advocate. However, opinions of them appear to be divided; While I have met many teachers who share my passion, others have been nonplussed or told me to 'just use a revision guide'. To me, knowledge organisers are the ultimate tool of inclusion. They will never replace the benefit of being taught by an expert. However, they create a situation in which every child, regardless of special need, attendance or socio-economic status, can have access to the core knowledge they need to succeed. However, this only happens if knowledge organisers are written well; I believe, in order to realise their benefits, knowledge organisers must be focused, sequential and accessible . Accessible: Many pupils will arrive at secondary school lacking in cultural capital, with a limited vocabulary or with little experience of subjects such as history or geog

Knowledge Organisers and Quizzing: Minimising the Matthew Effect

I believe that knowledge organisers can be the ultimate tool of inclusion. However, used poorly they can amplify the Matthew Effect, supporting most able while simultaneously disadvantaging those who need the most support. Put simply, they can cause the knowledge rich to get richer and the knowledge poor to get poorer. Over the four years which my department has used knowledge organisers, we have developed a number of techniques to minimise this effect and ensure that knowledge organisers benefit as many pupils as possible. Quiz questions: In order to encourage pupils to engage with the knowledge organisers, all of our homework is based around either answering quiz questions or practising quizzes which they have already completed. Originally, pupils wrote their own questions and answers. They were required to write a minimum of 7 questions and answers which the teacher would collect feedback on while they were completing their starters. Pupils would then have a set amount

Kick-starting the virtuous cycle of high-quality centralised resources

The day of my university graduation was also the day I learned that I had a place on a PGCE course. My other half, who did not know my parents very well, sat down with them for a coffee while I got my robes fitted. “Are you ready?” – My mother, a teacher who at that point had around 35 years of teaching under her belt. “…For what?” – My other half “This is going to be the hardest two years of Becky’s life. You’re going to need to support her and you’re not going to see much of her until she’s at least out of her NQT.” When I met up with my cheering session after the ceremony, he looked paler than I did. It’s now been eight years since that fateful conversation and my other half has more than stepped up to the challenge; he’s cooked dinners, ironed shirts, cut out lettering, dropped off forgotten books, made banana bread for the team, prepared an ungodly amount of chicken for ‘Humanities Fajitas’, and he can even tell you what TLAC stands for. Most importantly, he has always g