Skip to main content

Trips: voyages of confirmation rather than discovery



My mum is a primary school teacher and, as a child, this made me incredibly lucky. I spent every holiday visiting museums, galleries and other important exhibits across Britain. I didn’t especially look forward to soggy sandwiches and passing round a single plastic cup of own brand cola while we all sat on a bench in our cagoules. Nonetheless, I have fond memories of these trips. As an adult, I’ve continued this tradition, dragging anyone who shows even the slightest interest to museums of any size and almost any topic on "Miss Sayers' Magical Mystery History Tour". As an adult, I also feel that I come away from museums with much more than I did as a child (though I, of course, still buy the obligatory pencil).

After having a brief look at promotional material for many of these museums and historical sites, the purpose of them appears to be clear: children should go to museums to “put their detective skills to the test”, to “discover lost time periods” or to be “explorers”. These sites are presented as the perfect opportunity for pupils to explore subjects at their own pace and in their own way, avoiding the restrictions of the classroom and ensuring meaningful learning.

As appealing as this advertising is, I would argue that it is ultimately misleading. I have fond memories of my time in museums as a child, but I also remember thinking that objects or exhibits were “pretty” or “cool” without much further thought; Apparently I've visited Alnwick Castle, though I remember it as "the place with the cannon". At museums, I found my dad’s excitement over different objects odd and, at times, even embarrassing.

Now I proudly embody my father. I drag whoever’s with me over to different display cases to tell them about Native American coup sticks or the significance of the Winchester repeating rifle. However, this is not information that I have discovered on site, but rather information I already have which I can use to understand what is in the museum. My childlike glee derives from my ability to apply what I already know and, if I’m honest, to show off a bit.

In Daniel Willingham’s excellent “Why don’t students like school?”, he speaks about the danger of putting “hooks” at the beginning of lessons; pupils will remember the hook and not much else. Willingham advocates teaching content and then showing children the “hook”, allowing them to apply their knowledge rather than getting them to work backwards. Educational trips and visits appear to be the ultimate application of this theory.

The time I have spent on Edu-Twitter over the last academic year has shown me that I am apparently a “neo-trad” when it comes to education: I believe in the importance of knowledge, building every child’s “cultural capital” and I love a well-written knowledge organiser. I am also a firm advocate of educational trips and visits. However, if children are to get true benefit and satisfaction from these trips, they must have strong contextual knowledge to support them before they go. Rather than being voyages of discovery, trips should be viewed as opportunities for pupils to apply and confirm what they already know in a real world setting, allowing them to meaningfully build on their existing (and substantial) subject knowledge. Without such knowledge, a trip may well be a fun day out and a fond memory, but may lack significant academic merit.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kick-starting the virtuous cycle of high-quality centralised resources

The day of my university graduation was also the day I learned that I had a place on a PGCE course. My other half, who did not know my parents very well, sat down with them for a coffee while I got my robes fitted. “Are you ready?” – My mother, a teacher who at that point had around 35 years of teaching under her belt. “…For what?” – My other half “This is going to be the hardest two years of Becky’s life. You’re going to need to support her and you’re not going to see much of her until she’s at least out of her NQT.” When I met up with my cheering session after the ceremony, he looked paler than I did. It’s now been eight years since that fateful conversation and my other half has more than stepped up to the challenge; he’s cooked dinners, ironed shirts, cut out lettering, dropped off forgotten books, made banana bread for the team, prepared an ungodly amount of chicken for ‘Humanities Fajitas’, and he can even tell you what TLAC stands for. Most importantly, he has always g...
Post a Comment
Read more

Knowledge Organisers: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly

The term "knowledge organiser" has been used a lot over the last few years. They are a tool of which I am a passionate advocate. However, opinions of them appear to be divided; While I have met many teachers who share my passion, others have been nonplussed or told me to 'just use a revision guide'. To me, knowledge organisers are the ultimate tool of inclusion. They will never replace the benefit of being taught by an expert. However, they create a situation in which every child, regardless of special need, attendance or socio-economic status, can have access to the core knowledge they need to succeed. However, this only happens if knowledge organisers are written well; I believe, in order to realise their benefits, knowledge organisers must be focused, sequential and accessible . Accessible: Many pupils will arrive at secondary school lacking in cultural capital, with a limited vocabulary or with little experience of subjects such as history or geog...
Post a Comment
Read more

Building the foundation: How I write knowledge organisers

In my last post, “Knowledge Organisers: the good, the bad and ugly”, I argued that while knowledge organisers can be a powerful tool of inclusion, they only work if they are focused, sequential and accessible . When I first started writing knowledge organisers two years ago, my attempts did not even come close to meeting these criteria. As a result, they were cluttered, unfocused and ultimately an exercise in fashion over function. Since then, I have devised a standard method to ensure that any knowledge organisers I make have an impact and can be used in the long term: Identify key knowledge. Group your facts into sections. Write your sections. Number or code your sections. Quality assure your sections. 1.        Identify key knowledge It’s easy to fall into the trap of including too much in a knowledge organiser, particularly when writing about topics we’re interested or about which we know a lot. We want to share our passion and subject...
2 comments
Read more