Skip to main content

"I'm a boring teacher...even in term 6."

Over the last week, many teachers (myself included) have taken to their keyboards to express their objection to the TES’s policy of allowing teachers to charge for their resources. Unfortunately, this advert has riled me yet again.

Term 6 has the potential to be a difficult time in many schools; within a few weeks of term starting most assessments and exams are over. Not only this, but teachers and pupils are tired, everyone is quietly (or not so quietly) counting down to six weeks of rest, and lessons are often disrupted by trips and other events. All of these factors increase the risk of term 6 essentially becoming a throwaway: six weeks of “exciting” lessons which serve as fillers before the holiday.

The issue with this approach is that it sends a very clear message to pupils: lessons should only be challenging if they are leading up to an assessment. As result, once assessments are over, pupils are free to “enjoy” their lessons once again with easy topics or time fillers.

If we are to instill the inherent worth of education in pupils and retain our integrity as teachers, all lessons need to be challenging, regardless of whether the content is assessed or not. Equally, with great power comes with great responsibility. If pupils disrupt my lessons I have the right to isolate them for 24 hours. Am I willing to phone parents and inform them that I isolated their child because they weren’t paying attention to a DVD?

Term 6 provides teachers with an excellent opportunity to emphasise the inherent value of education and this can be communicated in a number of ways:

·        Teaching something outside of the taught curriculum
This is an excellent opportunity for teachers to demonstrate their subject knowledge and the passion for their subject. It teaches pupils that assessment is not what makes subjects worth learning and will hopefully help them to ‘catch’ the passion for the subject.

·         Projects (with structure!) which consolidate subject knowledge taught throughout the year
This gives pupils the chance to demonstrate the subject knowledge they have gained throughout the year. It also provides excellent opportunities for sustained deliberate practice which works towards mastery of different topics and techniques.

Obviously, these are not the only two options. However, whatever the approach, the emphasis needs to be on activities (especially those which span multiple lessons) which are well-scaffolded, have a clear learning purpose and which are challenging.

In one of my previous posts, “I’m a boring teacher and I’m proud of it”, I spoke about my belief that the purpose of education is to learn rather than to be entertained. I believe that the pitfalls some teachers fall into during term 6 highlight another misguided view; just as education should not have the happiness of its pupils as its main goal, nor should assessment be its ultimate purpose. Term 6 is an excellent opportunity to communicate this message. However, this should never be at the cost of academic rigor. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Knowledge Organisers: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly

The term "knowledge organiser" has been used a lot over the last few years. They are a tool of which I am a passionate advocate. However, opinions of them appear to be divided; While I have met many teachers who share my passion, others have been nonplussed or told me to 'just use a revision guide'. To me, knowledge organisers are the ultimate tool of inclusion. They will never replace the benefit of being taught by an expert. However, they create a situation in which every child, regardless of special need, attendance or socio-economic status, can have access to the core knowledge they need to succeed. However, this only happens if knowledge organisers are written well; I believe, in order to realise their benefits, knowledge organisers must be focused, sequential and accessible . Accessible: Many pupils will arrive at secondary school lacking in cultural capital, with a limited vocabulary or with little experience of subjects such as history or geog

Knowledge Organisers and Quizzing: Minimising the Matthew Effect

I believe that knowledge organisers can be the ultimate tool of inclusion. However, used poorly they can amplify the Matthew Effect, supporting most able while simultaneously disadvantaging those who need the most support. Put simply, they can cause the knowledge rich to get richer and the knowledge poor to get poorer. Over the four years which my department has used knowledge organisers, we have developed a number of techniques to minimise this effect and ensure that knowledge organisers benefit as many pupils as possible. Quiz questions: In order to encourage pupils to engage with the knowledge organisers, all of our homework is based around either answering quiz questions or practising quizzes which they have already completed. Originally, pupils wrote their own questions and answers. They were required to write a minimum of 7 questions and answers which the teacher would collect feedback on while they were completing their starters. Pupils would then have a set amount

The Battle of the Knowledge Organisers with metacognition.org.uk

The world of Knowledge Organisers is often a dichotomous one. Are you team ‘narrative’, or team ‘grid’? In this blog, Becky Sayers and Nathan Burns explore the purpose of both types, as well as their respective advantages, disadvantages and applicability across subjects. So place your bets, as the fight is about to start…!   Becky Sayers writes about the definition, purpose, advantages and disadvantages of the ‘narrative’   Knowledge Organiser. The ‘Narrative’ Knowledge Organiser Why do we use Knowledge Organisers? As a faculty, we have been using Knowledge Organisers for around seven or eight years. If I’m honest, the original reason I used them is because I was told to do so by a faculty leader in whom I had immense trust. I did not understand their overall purpose and, as a result, the pages I produced were fairly poor quality. However, over the years we have thought carefully as a team about their purpose and, as a result, the Knowledge Organisers we have produced as a te