Skip to main content

Satisfaction and success: infinitely better than fun

Every year in terms one and two, year 9 learn about the Holocaust. It would be wrong to say that this is a topic which I enjoy teaching. However, having studied World War Two during my GCSE, my A level and my degree, it is topic which I have regularly encountered and which I find interesting.

Despite this interest, when I first started teaching the Holocaust, I found it incredibly difficult. I would spend hours sat at my computer at a loss of how to approach topics. More often than not my lessons would end up centred around opinion and big philosophical questions. My students either produced mediocre work or their written pieces were littered with misconceptions. I believe this discomfort and poor quality ultimately came down to two factors: my lack of in-depth knowledge (despite the hours spent in classrooms and lecture theatres) and the Holocaust’s extremely sensitive nature.

I felt that this topic morally precluded two, then popular, methods of teaching history: teaching through ‘fun’ or ‘engaging’ activities, such as games or empathy pieces, or the more popular (but in my mind no more acceptable) voyeuristic method, in which pupils spend weeks doing little more than marvelling at horrible photos and accounts of people who were subjected to countless atrocities.

I came to the conclusion that the most respectful approach to take was an academic one: I spent a summer reading as much as I could about the Holocaust, using A level series like “Access to History” to see how to approach it when teaching. In September, I read pupils an eyewitness account of a SS death squad and then spent the rest of the unit attempting to dissect the events, atrocities and the possible motivations behind them from an academic perspective. When teaching complex topics, I did extra research and planned out the sequence of my explanations to try and clearly explain the stages behind them.



The result was extremely successful: I found my lessons often spilled over as I either had too much to teach or I would spend too long answering insightful questions. My pupils’ analyses improved and not once did I read a paragraph which ended with “…this suggests that Hitler was bad.” My crowning glory was a pupil who asked me why I was using Karl Lüger as an example of the use of scapegoats during the Middle Ages: he was, after all, the mayor of Vienna during the Renaissance.

I did not try to make this topic interesting or gory. I taught facts, factors, and schools of thought. However, my pupils still seemed genuinely interested. I believe this came down to my change in approach: at the end of each lesson, pupils left knowing more than they did before; at 13 or 14, pupils could explain the intentionalist and functionalist schools of thought in relation to the Holocaust; when pupils wrote conclusions or expressed opinions, these were genuine thoughts, as opposed to regurgitation of sheets I had given them.


Taking an academic, knowledge-based approach to teaching history initially sprang from a moral dilemma between the delivery and content. However, my application of the same process to other topics not only prepares students well for exams and later life, but it seems to have confirmed what I see to as the two keys to long-term, intrinsic motivation: satisfaction and success. “Fun” lessons are not only often inappropriate in history, but they provide a short term reward which does nothing to engender a deep love of the subject. I shudder at the thought of describing my lessons as “fun” but I love calling them “satisfying”.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knowledge Organisers: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly

The term "knowledge organiser" has been used a lot over the last few years. They are a tool of which I am a passionate advocate. However, opinions of them appear to be divided; While I have met many teachers who share my passion, others have been nonplussed or told me to 'just use a revision guide'. To me, knowledge organisers are the ultimate tool of inclusion. They will never replace the benefit of being taught by an expert. However, they create a situation in which every child, regardless of special need, attendance or socio-economic status, can have access to the core knowledge they need to succeed. However, this only happens if knowledge organisers are written well; I believe, in order to realise their benefits, knowledge organisers must be focused, sequential and accessible . Accessible: Many pupils will arrive at secondary school lacking in cultural capital, with a limited vocabulary or with little experience of subjects such as history or geog...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Battle of the Knowledge Organisers with metacognition.org.uk

The world of Knowledge Organisers is often a dichotomous one. Are you team ‘narrative’, or team ‘grid’? In this blog, Becky Sayers and Nathan Burns explore the purpose of both types, as well as their respective advantages, disadvantages and applicability across subjects. So place your bets, as the fight is about to start…!   Becky Sayers writes about the definition, purpose, advantages and disadvantages of the ‘narrative’   Knowledge Organiser. The ‘Narrative’ Knowledge Organiser Why do we use Knowledge Organisers? As a faculty, we have been using Knowledge Organisers for around seven or eight years. If I’m honest, the original reason I used them is because I was told to do so by a faculty leader in whom I had immense trust. I did not understand their overall purpose and, as a result, the pages I produced were fairly poor quality. However, over the years we have thought carefully as a team about their purpose and, as a result, the Knowledge Organisers we have produce...
Post a Comment
Read more

Building the foundation: How I write knowledge organisers

In my last post, “Knowledge Organisers: the good, the bad and ugly”, I argued that while knowledge organisers can be a powerful tool of inclusion, they only work if they are focused, sequential and accessible . When I first started writing knowledge organisers two years ago, my attempts did not even come close to meeting these criteria. As a result, they were cluttered, unfocused and ultimately an exercise in fashion over function. Since then, I have devised a standard method to ensure that any knowledge organisers I make have an impact and can be used in the long term: Identify key knowledge. Group your facts into sections. Write your sections. Number or code your sections. Quality assure your sections. 1.        Identify key knowledge It’s easy to fall into the trap of including too much in a knowledge organiser, particularly when writing about topics we’re interested or about which we know a lot. We want to share our passion and subject...
2 comments
Read more